After a six-month that engaged a broad range of stakeholders, including , the board of trustees of 草莓社区 has delayed formal action regarding the hiring policy and individuals in covenanted same-sex relationships.
The November 2013 board decision to suspend personnel actions related to the current hiring policy will remain in effect as discernment continues.
In offering his public appreciation to and his leadership team, Andy Dula, chair of the EMU Board of Trustees, said, 鈥淚 am proud to be part of EMU, a university where contentious issues can be engaged with mutual respect and with Christian discernment and compassion. We are extremely grateful for President Swartzendruber鈥檚 leadership during this challenging time.鈥�
鈥淭he process was consistent with how the church engages in discernment around difficult issues,鈥� said Carlos Romero, executive director of .
The president鈥檚 cabinet invited a wide range of constituents 鈥� including students, faculty, staff, alumni, donors, church leaders 鈥� to fill out survey forms giving their views on the hiring policy. 鈥淢ore than 7,000 people responded to our survey,鈥� according to BJ Miller, director of institutional research.
In addition, 20 鈥渄ialogue sessions,鈥� including approximately 300 individuals on campus, were held. At least one president鈥檚 cabinet member was present at each session to listen and anonymously report perspectives to the rest of the cabinet. The president and cabinet members also engaged leaders across the church.
鈥淭he listening process was extremely valuable in enabling the president鈥檚 cabinet to gain a deeper understanding of the range of feelings, hopes and fears about extending university employment to persons in same-sex covenanted relationships,鈥� added Dula.
鈥淏ased on this feedback, we acknowledge that the church is currently engaged in extensive discernment over human sexuality. We wish to honor our relationship with the church by not taking a final action now on changing EMU鈥檚 hiring policy.鈥�
According to Swartzendruber, 鈥淲e solicited feedback through the listening process, not because it is a democratic process but because we felt it was important to hear from those who care deeply about EMU.鈥�
Swartzendruber confirmed that views proved to be highly divergent and often passionate, regardless of the stance. 鈥淲e never expected to see consensus on this matter,鈥� said Swartzendruber. 鈥淲e were hoping for respectful dialog, and indeed this is what we saw within our university community. Internally there was a consistent theme of wanting to maintain unity in spite of our diversity on these and other important issues.
鈥淓MU鈥檚 role as a university is to grapple with the difficult questions of our time,鈥� he said. 鈥淔rom the beginning, we bathed this process in prayer, seeking God鈥檚 guidance. We also received encouragement from numerous church leaders and members to stay engaged with the Mennonite Church as we wrestle with these questions.鈥�
Dula said the board has no definite timetable for making a final hiring policy decision. 鈥淢any of us from EMU will participate in the Mennonite Church USA鈥檚 continuing discussions on human sexuality 鈥� we鈥檒l consider what emerges in the wider church in making our plans,鈥� he said.
The board鈥檚 official statement, passed by a strong majority vote on June 20, 2014:
We reaffirm EMU鈥檚 mission鈥攖o prepare students to serve and lead in a diverse global society鈥攁nd EMU鈥檚 role as a university that fully engages the difficult questions of our time and welcomes diverse perspectives and experiences into the conversation. Out of respect for EMU鈥檚 relationship with Mennonite Church USA and its ongoing discernment of human sexuality, we defer action on formally changing EMU鈥檚 policy on hiring employees in covenanted same-sex relationships. The November 2013 board decision to suspend personnel actions related to the current hiring policy will remain in effect as the discernment process continues.